|
|
The Antichrists War Room
|
|
|
|
We are not amused and your numbers scare me not at all, for we shall defend the land and our person to the death, as we uphold freedom in in the devils name and those who would join with me in freedom, can do so. but it changes nothing here.
I am the antichrist, and my banner is raised.
yes the kingdom is broke, and yes their is more chance of parliment paying their deficit back then us honering those demands, not at least until well make money here again
|
Screw this, New Deal - the devil is the world, the world's above god, and i will rule in the devils name pour je suis roi ici
With me as as your leader - the consumption of petrol driven vehicles will be outlawed in
ten years, in particular the production of all gasoline vehicles. Which is the only way this is going to work in time.
Lets make it work people,
we have a planet to run. no exceptions, and those who suffer
will be compensated accordingly.
spirit is on my side (I hope), and i will not hesitate to nuke any country which fails
in its commitment please usa
take careful note. If you think I'm bluffing think again, as i want nukes in Cuba,
the jokes on you as you ignore the world.. and yes I already know (sometimes), what's
happening next!
- by executive order of Gareth Bowen, the antichrist,
and anyone who doubts my word, better speak up now, as this is the last time you
ever going to hear from me again (not really), as frankly i no longer care and I would love the peace
that only divorcing god can bring,
least i sucome to the level of slave labour again, which is a totalitaian regime
elected in by only 16.2% of the population, and as majorities go, it sucks. and
i think we can do beter then that now! (j'ai esperer)
This site contains everything
we need, to start the ball rolling for the most important political race in British and European history.
The antichrist for president of europe now
The future begins here today, with You and me, for we are one and
many, as I begin another rant again. It's no longer about us, it's about them,
and the coming together of independent thought as we try and preserve freedom again.
To find out what Gareth Bowen, The psychic BDSM gothic pro european satanic communist witch 's policies are, what he wants in government
and the reasons why he wants it.
click
here
As i try and condence all my politics down to one place. 101 pages at last count, so easy reading to take at your leasure and is liable to grow
at this rate... as technically "it's still a draft."
|
|
|
Which is why its flawed, as you will never get the alternative crowd co-operating,
Satanists kneeling to one another, trying to boost each other? your taking
the piss, as their is no room for hierarchy here at all. which perhaps makes this
job difficult with the other feudal system still in place (i so wanted a round table
*sob* and yet I don't work well with anyone so its my way or the high way - a monarch
with no kingdom mais c'est la vive, je devine... which is perhaps why this lot will
never work in practice and should be read as a comedy instead as no one is going
to be stupid enough to vote the devil (me) in charge, as no one cares about freedom,
human rights anymore... you need a monarch who doesn't want to be restricted in
anyway. to tell parliment to go f**k themselves, which in turn preserves freedom
for all!
the many shall never rule the one and I am not a slave
[please note as i am a genious, and a word smith like no other you will still need
parliment (the many) to preserve your rights, least i choose to enslave the lot,
and while i hope never to come american in my views - power corrupts so its kind
of a balancing act - one against many, and you need someone who understands the
law to uphold freedom well as parliment is akin to 7 blokes votin to rape a women,
and you need the one to step in and stop them! before everyone gets screwed as the
many can never be trusted at all]
Vote gareth bowen for president (or anything,
I no longer care, really i don't), and here's
my manifesto for peace of mind
The antichrist's banner, and i care not if you call it Europe, the UN, or anything
else, just as long as your happy, and we remain free! so protect your rights
i will, if you let me.
though i reserve the right to become board and screw you over, for kicks at this
rate, don't you get it. your not learning to share... so what happens, when those
in power, choose to kick your ass, and teach you otherwise...
Tick, Tock
I just the run the show, its up to you to make it work! shit comes from up on high,
now deal with it! and yes, i control the purse strings, you've already demonstrated
you can't be trusted.
Now It's Time for
YOU TO SERVE ME, IN THE DEVILS NAME
(This is a once in a lifetime opportunity, which may or may nor save the planet as continued here. Now please
Read It,
before you loose the lot, or maybe not, as i may not have proofread it
yet, your not one of these geeks who cares more about image are you? i hope not,
or this will never work...)
|
We Need You!
Support the site and donate money to the cause.
Return To Politics Index
Remember the Wank for freedom campaign? perhaps not for alas, it was censored, which just
shows you how far article ten went..
nothing gets past the gates of the moon, these days, by moon we mean fear, and by
fear we mean the bbc in that nothing is put out, unless you buy them off, seems
facebook's done better then us there...
I did say I was into the occult didn't I? just thought it might be relevant in
the coming years, what religion and all being so relevant and me being able to
take the piss, out of any of the prophets of old, a little ace in the hole, so in
the meantime try some strip poker, relax and enjoy your freedom, for without risk
there is no chance to life. you have to learn to loose, before you can learn to
win, so with that i leave you for now, to concentrate on writing the site, anything
you need, just ask and i shall do my best to help...
My proposed Freedom Of Information and/or Knowledge Act/treaty/directives/law which
is crap - i just can't be arsed to delete it now
No government, state or organisation shall regulate, or prevent any other state,
government or individual gaining access to information and or knowledge in any format or medium, electronic or otherwise if that information can be deemed educational
by any, or all of the parties involved. So long as that information and or knowledge
was produced and distributed with the consent of all
the precipitants involved in the production of it it, as well as that information and/or information
doesn't breach any rights to privacy.
Furthermore privacy and/or lack of consent
will not be used to limit the circulation of information which could help protect or enhance the public good. i.e. the safety
of others.
It
shall also be illegal to
punish anyone for the distribution and or the reception
of any such information and or to block any such distribution from occurring between consenting
parties and/or to prevent anyone advertising that any such information
or knowledge is available in any medium for distribution. i.e. if you want the information
your allowed it without any restriction at all.
Furthermore it does not matter if the information and or knowledge in deemed strategic, military and/or offensive in nature, just so long as consent was fully given
for its production and its circulation by the parties involved, no person, state or government shall
hinder the flow of any such information while that information
can be deemed educational to the point anyone can learn from it.
However this does not prevent any government, organisations, or individuals from
regulating against accidental exposure to any such information which may be deemed inappropriate to certain audiences, just
as long as such
regulation does not impede or restrict access or distribution
of such information and/or knowlege between any of the individuals, groups, societies and/or
governments where consent was given and a desire to be informed exists. It is assumed minors can not give consent, on such issues
which could be judged harmful in nature when it comes to appearing in or being referenced to any and/or all information which could be
deemed exploititive or harmful in any way.
(observations on the above, it should be obvious to the more observant, that by
explicitly allowing the transmition and circulation of military information, states
and/or other organisations will have to fall back to a privacy defence, to avoid
exposure. this is entirely deliberate as it forces them to respect and uphold article
8 and a citizens right to privacy, and a failure to observe and protect such rights.
leaves them open to the law of hypocrisy
where we ensure that they don't make one law for them, and another for the individuals
who fall within their remit) everyone is entitled to information, and no one has the power to limit such access, which would be harmful for the development of the free world and democracy in general
Donations for the campaign welcome |
Leaflets to stick up around Europe and perhaps the world - if it embarrasses
the states to change their ways...
One Life, One
Vote Campaign New Labour, New Auswitch.
Only 16% voted for labour in 2005, hardly anyone for the executive,
and they continue to undermine our base freedoms, and show scorn for the fundamental
law. |
Key Points on Reform
How I'd handle presidential pardons includes
real case
One Life, One Vote. drop the voting age to 12, giving the legal guardian the
proxy vote till that age. with the ability to appoint a proxy via the
power of attorney if mentally incapacitated or unable to vote for a particular
reason.
Those taking their seats on the council of Europe must have 51% of the national
vote, else they are deemed illegitimate
Judges Elected for life times, so we can start holding states to account, for their
abuses of freedom. see new labour = new auswitch.
A democratically elected president, to protect and uphold the peoples freedoms, maintained
at least 51% of the national vote.
The separation of church and state, way too much religion creeping in.. Christian
democrats *puke* always ends badly when government starts dictating morals.
teaching what can and can't be done with psychic/spiritual development is another
matter...
The Campaign Speech
Liberalisation
its time to end the fear, and the slavery and allow people to be themselves, free
of harassment or oppression
So let us
liberalise the states, and let us lead the free world, as the free world!
not as a shadowy imposter
- this means that no state or government has any more rights granted in law
then the individual, and neither the state or the
individual is above the law. Thereby no group, body or individual shall
take steps to limit or regulate integration between any consenting parties, beyond
the minimum required to protect those rights of those who don't consent to the risk,
and only so long as that mitigation doesn't impede or restrict the rights of the
individuals involved. no state, government or individual has the right to impose
moral judgement and/or restrictions on anyone else, and thereby any such restrictions
can only extend to protecting against accidental harm, nucence or exposure and
this is the fundamental principle of humanity, free will and choice.
- So with that in mind, there should be no restriction on anyone trying to inform
or persuade people of the risks involved so long as that they cease any and all
such harassment once the individual declares themselves fully informed. steps only
may be taken to restrict freewill if a person is deemed incapable of rational choice
and only up until such condition lasts.
Adjusting regulations to match:
- Lower the drinking age to 14 on licensed premises if accompanied by parents.
This will prompt a healthier
lifestyle by teaching children to drink responsibly
from an early age. lower it to 16 across Europe unaccompanied. I'd rather they were indoors, with adults around, rather then hiding it on the streets.
- legalise all drugs, and tax accordingly. there is no need to impose your will on
consenting adults, merely instruct and educate on the risks.
- relax porn rules, inline with the other states, as well as legalising prostitution
in line. i for one, would be willing to sell my body to teach, when it comes to
sex... to instruct confidence and break the fear. of course I'm a politician so
would do that anyway...
- take us into the common currency, sooner rather then later.
- The right to bear arms and defend oneself is covered in my view on
pardons. which is that the individual maintains the same right and freedoms
as the states do, up until such time that the world collectively outlaws that
the keeping of such weapons by any man or government. The individual may take any
and all steps required to defend themselves.
Morality
- Abortion is the mothers choice, up unto birth and we have the right to respect doctors
beliefs who don't want to do it, and/we can't stop prevent people from travelling
to get it done, and you have to publicise what/age your willing to do it, and give
them access to information on who can and is willing to perform it.
- Again no government, state or group shall restrict information from those who want
it. which includes sexual education for all those who have maintained sexual maturity.
Let biology be the judge, not government. in fact one may argue it is best to give
them access before that time!
on stem sell/medical research
- Unless it can be proven that a risk to the physical well being of the masses is
present in such procedures (i.e. along the lines of 28 days later) then it is beyond
the remit and jurisdiction of parliament or mealy regulate on ethical/moral grounds
as that decision remains soley in the remit of the consenting adults. Government
exceeds its jurisdiction when it attempts to legislate on mere moral or ethical
grounds alone. Its function solely rests with legislating to minimise the exposure
of risk on innocent and unconcenting parties and/of course to protect their safety.
no risk, no regulation for it is that simple as no government, state or parliament
has a place intruding and imposing its will on the private and/or family life's
of individuals when there is no apparent risk to public safety.
Environment
Warning: this tie's in with stuff, i was
shown years back, and even now am only
starting to grasp, what it means.
i'm up for it, and enjoy the challenge do you?
(my book had more, if memory serves as ages come, and ages go, and i may have forgot to write it down, oops i never did
think it was that big, (or possible) until now. sorry about that.. the mind moves
on, and this is going to be fun)
- everyone has a duty to protect the environment and seek better
more efficient ways of doing things, it should be in the scope of the people to regulate
in order to protect the environment but in doing so they should compensate those
companies, and or individuals who would be put to undo hardship by any change in
regulation or law outlawing items and or practices so they are not hard done by.
- Damage caused/alleged should be clearly labelled so people can make an informed decision
about the consequences of their actions and thus putting a greater incentive on
industry for increasing the quality and purity of output.
Defence
- Europe reserves the right to extract its citizens from harms way, and once they
are safely secured we shall peruse any additional action though the courts and any
and such investigations required to fulfil proof of such atrocities for the adjudication
of the international courts. Incidentally i see no reason while extracting our citizens
we can't also extract any other vulnerable people who request or require assistance,
assuming such extraction doesn't jeopardise our own citizens safety or that of the
military. It is my desire that Europe act on the knowledge and the facts and not
on mere conjecture or belief as some nations would have.
Health Care
Get Your Free European Union Health Insurance Card
More preamble
while we have a duty to protect the weak and the vulnerable, that does not extend
to restricting what information they filter and process as that is censorship, that is control,
and that is slavery by any other name. It is the first hurdle to freedom, relaxing
your need to control and limit people, you have to learn to trust, respect and
tolerate and it should be noted that all slavery begins with justifying the need
for control/moderation and or censorship. this should be taken for what it is,
a naive desire to control your fellowman, and its the time of justification people like
Hitler and/or Sadam used, it's time to respect their rights and give them
the freedom of choice.
|
"If Paris was worth a mass, the devil's worth the world"
"new labour, new Auswitch, let the apathy begin as we censor your right to knowledge... and spin it down"
"Business is the world, without the world, we are nothing, so when you think
local, then think the world as that's as local as we're going to get, without it
we're nothing, and that includes the environment too... anyone for tea? I'm British
and the shops in the states... just a click away...
embarrassing really should have been Europe"
"Religion has no part in good government, separation must be maintained... Belief
is divisive whilst questioning unites on the bridge of compromise"
"Why believe, when we can know, it's time to question and learn, rather then listen
and forget, so with that proof by exception, and first principles every time..."
(in relation to the Religious Stupidity Index, tarot and
my life as a psychic, BDSM, gothic witch)
|
Strategy for Reform
The 1984 style elections must end. I want to outlaw first past the post elections
which prevent people from voting for independents or who they may want to vote for.
as it stands people are scared into voting for the lesser of two evils. which is
not good enough, we need to elect people on 51% of the vote minimum.
This could be done on a ruling under protocol one, article three of the human rights
act, to bring the parties to heal.
Further we have been a member of the European union and the federal government since
1st January 1973 and allowed an unelected council control of law which supersedes
uk statue. our statue must give way and is not allowed to obscure EU Law period.
This e means its imperative that those positions are elected by voters. ergo i plan
to implement a small change which would ensure we get to vote them on!
As it stands this position is dictated in our case by an unelected government which
could have as little as 16% of the national vote, going by the last 2005 election.
the foreign minister should not have that power. So let the people decide,
with a democratic vote. Perhaps expanding it, to one "senator" per 20 million
of the population. which would give the uk 3 seats. and countries get a minimum
of one representative. This vote would take place at a national level, with nominated
individuals standing and not parties. To counterbalance how the EU parliament's
elected, I here it's called a separation of power...
The president would no longer be nominated by these unelected officials [currently the council] but would
be instead elected by the people, for the people. Which would at least ensure proper vetting, and ensure the people get a say on the legislative agenda.
. we would still have the house of representatives
which in Europe's case is made up of the EU parliament. Watch the west wing for this in practice.
This is not a referendum issue as all we are doing is making the existing structure
more democratic, which incidentally is why the national parties tend to mislead you, for they don't want
to loose the power and control which comes from having not having the support of the electorate. Why have the vote, when you can avoid it;)
reminds me the following comparison on British polices. you have a choice between voting Sadam in or his replacement ossama bin laden, and perhaps an unknown candidate who for sake of argument is the unknown bloke out of west wing series seven.
who do you vote for?
In Britain it would run like this. The parties would say Santos can't win here, so choosing the lesser of two evils to get the other out, we would pick ossama (at least he blows other people up) cue labour comparison in Iraq thus replacing sadam (conservatives, northern ireland least we forget history) while real peace, would never get a chance to flourish here.
|
Screw education remove the grants and
let the book burnings begin! British
politics at its best |
|
Did You Know - convention is propaganda not legal fact.
|
This means the queen should and can use her veto to protect our freedoms and democracy, in fact she can still elect anyone she wants as prime minister, and remove them as well! In fact the whole cabinet!
There have been a few occasions where it could and would have been preferable that she had acted, showing her increased wisdom. over a house which knows very little.
one where its members often don't know what door means what, or even what "the fuck
they are voting on"
Iraq for one, and the removal of tony Blair as pm another.
other acts which threaten habeas corpus and the manga carta and no group of people has the power to undermine or restrict the basic human freedoms and rights recognised by humanity. So no to 49 days in prison without
charge.
In these situations the queen has a duty to uphold the constitution.
In fact it could be argued that parliament would work better if, she choose the minorities as the executive in order to better represent the purpose of which parliament was intended by our bill of rights in 1688. so there you have it, legally the
queen has at least as much power, and when you consider only 16% of the parliament
voted for the last labour majority, and none for the executive, their argument for
democracy fall flat on their face. We need wisdom, guidance, leadership and not
Muppets in power.
Polite Suggestion
On those occasions, the people are outraged at how an illegitimate and unelected
executive try and dictate to the world, and/or the good people of this nation - with
only 16% of vote, which is hardly democratic.
It might be wise and prudent to petition her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II to act for and on behalf of
the people....
So for example if one were to present her with sufficient number of votes, say more
votes then the cabinet had, one would be more then justified in blocking any bill...
so she in fact could hold any referendum she so desired...
Just an idea, to restore freedom to this land... if that's what you want, of course..
Your humble servant gothiclight, the antichrist, wishing to restore democracy and balance to the law of the land... |
As everyone would be too scared to vote for the unknown just in case no one else did, and thus we avoid getting a true reflection of who people wanted. Just
look at the election material posted thought peoples doors at every election...
money wins. This is why you have to change it, to first, second, third choices and combine them till you get a a majority of at least 51%. in cases of a tie, you use the first choice number... this way we can say who we would prefer and fall back
to the lesser of two evils, with out second or third choices. Of course, you don't
have to put anymore choices, and if no one gets at least 51% its assumed a no vote,
ron wins!. There is also the option of the bundestag in Germany. (as above but
half the seats are from party lists to make the percentages match the national vote.
so labour would have had 36% of the seats in that house based on the 2005 election.)
Anyway enough of the inadequate and my view illegal local politics we continue to inflict on the electorate, which reminds me i have considered a defamation law suit on that one.
Technically sweeping statements that x can't win here. Is more a belief and in actual
reality everyone has a chance! So on that note its technically misleading the electorate!
I'm guessing the judiciary would agree with literal translation and education as
it is.
In my view, if i was standing in that position, I think I'd have to sure to get
a correction. Just in the name of fair play, and this sporting the good British
humour we're so proud of. literal democrats anyone? they sulked when they lost that
one, so they should at least know where the judiciary stands. Anyway on that
note it's back to once again regaining our voice in Europe where the law
matter more, which is of course the reason why we so solely need to restore the balance,
with someone who knows the implication of words, and how statute combine for interesting
results and hence the reason for human rights! the Muppets of the lower house, have
short memories... I on the other hand never forget. so if they refuse to make it more
democratic. the wording your after is protocol one, article three of the human rights
acts.
So with that how do we as a people, make the council sign off on handing power back to us and thus restoring the balance. an elected democractic majority to Europe. I Suggest the following
plan for driving the change.
We begin by following the current council around with placards showing how many people
voted for them, compared to the number of people they represent, in all cases this
is going to be next to 0% of the vote. Even better we follow
the leaders of
Europe and the council around Europe dressed as the fool
Representing new beginnings and highlighting to the world how much of a joke they
really are.
Democracy begins here, today, with you
Together we reveal collectively how hypocritical labour and the other nationalist
parties have been. No longer should we the people be scared off, lied or manipulated.
it's time to reclaim government, and put an end to religious parties such
as the Christian democrats for that crosses the line on separation article
nine and ten which corresponds to articles70-72 in the treaty on the fundamental
of human rights. should ensure we keep people's beliefs out the race,
moral blackmail and scare tactics outlawed.
This is why i want to run as president, for i want to ensure the freedoms of the
world, are protected and not undermined, as it stands currently. it brings a tear
to my eye, watching out country disintegrate and continue to pass legislation which
undermines those base freedoms, because people know, no better. it is up to the
position of president to hold politicians like Tony Blair in contempt, to say ni when
we begin to allow a return to natzi Germany on our own soil. free legal aid, and
not locking people up without intent or evidence is imperative to maintain the respect
and the status of the free world. without it, we become a joke, which ends in prison,
and runs the risk of new Auzwitch style disappearances taking over. especially with
the press moderated, and censored as it is.
We need to get back to focusing on allowing the people to speak their mind, free
of reprisals and terror tactics on the behalf of states who haven't the legitimacy of modern government. which is 51% not the 16% of Britian. As it stands currently they are slowly trying to
undermine our base freedoms with the removal of legal aid (against
article 6), insane attempts (against article 5) to lock people up with no charge,
and to make matters worse, you don't according to the British government even need
to have intent. this is harking back to the dark witch burnings of old, where knowledge
was penalised and instead of executing you, they will lock you up, for paint ball,
or even holding a stick. you know how to mix chemicals, it matters not that your
a chemist, if for example in the case of mortar papers. your knowledge could be
implied, or even insinuated to have an ulterior motive beyond legitimacy we will
do you for it. that means everyone who knows anything is at risk.
this means the precedent set by the British courts could lock anyone up, for
even reading a novel such as 1984. for it undermines the state. that is why we need
a president which speaks for the people, and those imposters from the parties are
no longer fit to serve. we need a new breed, for a new future which puts your liberty
and your safety first. Be creative and take democracy in your own hands, petition
the parliament for change. and vote the antichrist president of Europe! for
tomorrow, you might not get a second change!
and yes i am a wanker. Wee the video's to remove any doubt that you might have! Just remember at least i air on the side
of good government, caution freedom and reason and want to know before acting, belief is not enough.
With enough sense, and proof that even i could challenge the
pope to a showdown, on democracy, thelogy and religion. Which is another bug bear
of mine, scaring people to serve or making them fear the unknown all to cling to power, it's not on. Period.
People should be free and allowed to do as they want and what's more they
should be give the confidence to achieve those goals, tempted if you will...
So yes with that in mind, I would convert the pope, for if Paris was worth a mass, the devil - and freedom -
is worth the world. No more tyranny. Come on we're big boys now, we can build on what went before, create not destroy, with our own insight, and reason or are they just academic wanabee's pretending to care.
It's not about regurgitation of facts and figures. It's about have the balls to stand up and take action. So to take Navarre and the wars of religion in a modern context,
the insanity must cease to be, and we should get back to building, learning, sharing, and more importantly healing our differences, and setting aside belief to build on what we know, so
no more dictating what is right, and who is right to do what. It's a matter of free will.
That in itself is a no brainer, and it is regrettable that we live in a world, where speaking your mind, and being true to yourself should send you to hell and back.
Loose the fear, mark the antichrist
as your only safe choice in the elections, freedom matters, and you deserve the best for your future, and your loved ones. Regardless how many that may be.
The future timetable for democracy could be achieved
in a day if you really wanted it. Yes it IS that simple! that perverse a child of six, could make a better job of it, then some of those leaders. take the test? is it right to lock someone up in a cupboard without speaking to anyone for 46 sleeps, i think the answer will be a resounding NO, yet still this twits in office try and get away with it.
There's a reason for federal government, and that reason stands the test of time. Though be warned as it stands currently those morons appear to be stonewalling it to death. trying to allude to complicatedness where there is none to find, you did it back in 1973. all that remains is making yourselves electable, and thus completing the process which was already decided years ago.
Come on does it take one man, with no executive experience to write it up? where 25,00 commissioners and political
the entire experience of nations fail. Two paragraphs, to free the world. Elected by the people for the people. to serve the nations and protect their rights.
Yes, again without sounding reparative as something tells me, these people are hard of hearing, either lacking the basic reasoning to do the right thing, or perhaps they have no clue to what is blindingly obvious to one man, with no affiliation who hasn't sold his soul to the party line.
Yes freedom demands we make those positions electable! and liberty demands we do it now, least another bell crack with time wasting!
Is it that hard to give up the reigns of power, and return it to the people?
it's not hard, the states have had it for centuries. as a business you would fail,
too many bloody committees
You know its obvious, finish the task, or give
it to someone who can! So I here by demand by order
of the Antichrist
- blood optional 0 that you sign it back to the people, and give them the choice.
for your excuses for delay are pathetic and while it may fool the uneducated sheep,
who flock to your call, it fools not me one jot. so do it now, before it's
too late.
We stand on the brink of history and it must be allowed to run its course, and take
the logical outcome. No more fire fighting its time to uphold and implement
that strategic vision the framers had in mind, on either side of the world. then
and now! for they were the one and the same, ad on infinite item...
go on I dare you, tempt yourself... just this once, to try
and make history for the right reasons, to let the creative potential flow, and
make the difference to the people for the RIGHT reasons and not the wrong ones,
so yes give them the vote, and let them pick the people who they want to pick,
and not as it stands currently where we are forced to pick those we don't want,
as frankly nothing gets done with that system, and it show. 1973 - 2008 and progress
achieved zip. all because they fear it!
Give me a week, and it will be in writing in fact most business would have completed
it in an afternoon! perhaps highlighting the difference between the private and
public sectors! though perhaps its best to stay focused on one goal, and one agenda
at a time, so that means you can't have national ties, while in office for the duration,
if you hadn't noticed that is...
I could go on, but i fear the points been made too many times already. the rest is just ridicule or forcing
people to listen, and open up, for change and please if you don't understand something
just ask, i will be happy to take any leader aside and tell them why they can't
do what their trying to do, as it stands! I don't bite, really I don't... unless
asked of course...
So here's to new beginnings our future
matters more, a future
where skill and sharing means something, and of course an ability to read
helps - please take note, uk independence party,
you appear to have lost track of what was signed, contracts being contracts and all... words matter...
To love and to do, is one which i hope will take us through the gates of hell, and return us to a brighter future, when people reslise they have nothing to fear
but their own incompetence for failing to understand the ramifications of what
they did years ago, it's not hard to look and open your eyes, its all written here,
and has been for years.
Now think and reflect on a place where we are free to be ourselves, without fear or prejudice
and the slavers of old. we need to learn the law, and the reasons for it. the fundamentals like learning to read take precedence
in this life... loose that, and loose the world, for your solutions matter, your
opinions and your ideas, our motives and your intent decide the future of this
world, not the other.
So to safeguard and protect ourselves from those who would abuse it, loose it, and
throw it to the wind... I give you the antichrist. not all lawyers fight for justice, and technically he is an i.t. geek who dables in the law, psychic development
and well freedom.
Choose wisely,
freedom demands knowledge, education and the sharing of ideas. We can not allow
censorship and fear to continue unabated you are strong
enough, and wise enough to be exposed to ideas, images and pictures, which give
you choice, and break your fear.... so you can continue to grow and well live
the life you wanted, rather then the shadow of one they your superiors, mothers,
fathers, and authority figures wanted.. your all equal in this world, you all have
the same potential to succeed you just need to be shown how, nothing hidden, nothing
gained, knowledge is power and its your birthright, to bear all those who hide
the truth, hide the facts, and try and protect people from the ideas, that govern
the world...
it's time to learn to trust, and to love,
and to respect our fellow man, embracing our differences, and protecting the
weak against those states who would see you blinkered to life, to choice and well
to love, in the devil's playground, for its you and you alone who have the power
and the responsibility to choose your own destiny, and perhaps we might be honour
bound to prevent you from achieving certain aims, but in the end, there is no right
and wrong, only the illusion of choice, and we mean to bring you that choice, no
matter what happens next.... prepare for a new day, a new tomorrow one where we
can still love openly, free from reprisal for your choice is my choice, and well
i love you anyway, no matter what happens next...
|
[*1] while loveland is good, i have to note then when reviewing convention on Canada, he quotes one case, where the courts rule that they can't question an act of parliament however if the passing of act, was in turn in breach of other law, then that act could be stricken out, and anything which followed it.
this appears not to apply to the law reform act, as it was done following the process. (some of the former colonies still need to present bills for royal and parliamentary assent if they change their constitutions at which point Britain most likely will strive to pass the buck...politics in motion.
Ordinary statues can be implicitly repealed, while constitutional ones have to be explicit and it is possible for any of the estates to willingly give up its sovereignty which it did back in 1973. just as the lords did in 1911, and the king in 1688, and as the act's of union and now estate can grant themselves "powers" which the courts can't recognise, outside the common law.
so yes those old statues are still in play, which is why it's wise not to forget the law, despite how much certain houses would like you to forget it. So don't be scared of taking legal action against a government if you have correct grounds to do so, the courts most likely will love it, or not. depending on your judge. the law is the law and
not even parliament is above it.
it is with that view. that while parliament regulates with the sole protection of protecting the people, and mitigating risk. its use of statue restricting the courts against tyranous acts. the same argument should be played by the courts to protect against the tyranny of parliament. If parliament legislates past its inceptions, if it attempts to do as hitler did, pass laws which being to suppress and move beyond the limits required to mitigate against a risk. then they should deem it ultra vires... as it stands the courts argues they are bound by statue, and its not there place to judge though, i fear that the time will come that if the judges don't
speak up, then there is no fallback option to protect the people beyond what is already in place in the human rights acts. this does not as it stands go far enough, in mitigating the risk of a parliament gone mad. it should also be observed that no matter how much we may resort to the courts for settlement, there will be occasions where people will always resort to a test of skill, be it combat or something else to resolve matters. assuming its consensual and no innocents are harmed, it might be a more dignified way of proceeding on some issues. as far too many countries are resorting to tactics which would be classed as uncivilised in earlier times. so with that, any government, person or group who lets or allows damage to civilian property ,or allows any innocents and none concentual parties getting hurt, is guilty of war crimes, and should be judged accordingly by the courts.
your either in profit, loss and/or breaking even.
growth for profit is pointless. you either have enough to live on, or you don't.
if you company/government/you have enough to live on, then you effort is best focused on helping other people/companies/organisations getting self sufficient and stable
if on the other hand, your loosing your wealth, your outgoings, more then your incomes. you seriously need, help to stabalise it. loans don't help that, people do.
so the focus of western society to capitalise and grow, is perhaps wondrously short-sighted when done in issolation,
forw and swallow everything up, tramble, consume, destroy. hardly sporting, being the last man standing, with no one left to enjoy anything, but yourselves.
Si while they continue to grow, swallow up, destroy and consume the little men. You have to wonder
are they doing it for the right reasons, people are slain in their thousands, as
the money is taken off the streets, people are held to ransom, with huge rate rises,
all to what. enslave them? to make them fear authority, and which leads. to a few
in charge, and the rest subservient, so much for a country of equals, how about
the return of serfdom *ahudder* < I'd rather see a cottage industry, of people sustaining
themselves, then multi-billion doller banking corporations, just seeking to profit,
instead of build, invest and help the little man, get self sufficient, that means
passing things on, ideas, contacts and knowledge everyone perhaps wants something
different in life, we have our own neiche, which we can continue to specialise in. (though perhas, i'd rather learn everything, and do anything, then your not wanted. even if your better, then those who can't do anything else, hard to sell)
So why is it they can't fight it out
on their own...
bah sod it, the only other random point, which isn't fixed here. is that without
"evil", the rebellious and outspoken side of nature, the fear would get worse, it takes
those who revel, against society to remind them they have options, they can always
do something else, if not, why not? surely, there's something there for everyone, most if not all, enjoy the strangest things.
almot as though they were born for it, but that's another storey. when things come full circle, and people do what they intended, and soon enough move on and diversify elsewhere. spreading the seeds of knowledge.
which fall on deaf ears, or not.
Too many times, we can't say anything, we are restricted in what we do? all for what, the more fear we have, the more we lock up, the more we don't be ourselves,
the more our ability to love vanishes.
say nothing, do nothing, fear everything, fear the risk of trying and watch the suffering continue, people fearing to whisper their thoughts and fears.
your not right, your mental, you spoke out, your experience is not what we require, its too specialised, too unique, too well dangerous, it brings all these unanswered questions, which we can't don't want to deal with.
we prefer to do nothing, stick our heads in the sand, and watch it suffer.
no change here, we can't allow it, your not speak to them, they are my contacts. Bollocks to that, we have a duty to speak our minds, and be outselves, at all levels of sociery, and not be penalised for it, as no sooner do we penalise
speaking our minds, then the independent well of creativity, and potential vanishes down the black hole of despair...
So love vanishes, partners are too scared to share their oppinion, society bread it out of us at school, and humour or ideas curicified on the same old drivel.
you have to obey the official line, if its not written here, it can't be true, no exploration, no investigation. your not ready for it, and perhaps with some governments, you never will be.
As people would be too scared to do anything, take the risk, take the chance, do something, anything, but not that, just not yet, when then? if ever...
it offends, well actually perhaps it doesn't but I'm scared, it does. so lets not try it, let's not open the box, that's not save ourselves, thats crucify it instead.
misery, follows, and the deaths do rise, all for what. because no one cared, too stuck in the sand, with their own worries, their own outspoken fears, rather then letting go, and relax..
or they loose the lot... rebellion on the other hand, encourages people,
that perhaps they can do that, and why not, when nothing comes of it, when its never
as bad, as it looked, the fear is lost, ergo society benefits from the trouble makers,
as when things get broke, they are cleared up, never did look as bad, of course
their is a line on that side. but meh. no one's perfect, not even me, which is the point i'm human, i need to love, breath and well do something, anything, but what (sigh)
I knew I'd outgrown the world, but this is starting, to take the piss, when i say outgrown, the games, the distractions and the politics, the cause and effect, so blatent, one
wonders what the point of living, perhaps i should save myself the bother, put myself down, save society the bother, and let them continue, as they have always done, stripping it back.
and repeating history, of the worst, kind, never learning, and never moving on... to get past it, and well...
The ultimate irony, without the nasty side, their would be no life, no love only fear. for one can not sustain oneself, if the boundaries aren't pushed back, challenged, and argued against.
of course, you could try and erase all the outspoken ideas, but that never worked anyway, as once created, they stay their, circlating in the ether, always ready to bounce back.
so the only defence, is perhaps self sufficiency, and teaching communications, as i remember I'm writing politics, and perhaps, it needs to come more focused, on outcome... joining together, and well letting people do
what they want, and rather then focusing on personal greed, we work out what people
want to do, then help them achieve it... notwithstanding, people want to scale up.
but if i could start over. i wouldn't have bothered. do it while your young, the curve, of nothing, as you slowley expand, and learn your potential, before uni and work has crushed it out of you, slave no more.
serve no one but yourself, and loose the lot, but work to help, achieve something, being the best, perhaps it leads somewhere, but people are fickle, and meh what do i know, i spoke my mind, and look what happened here...
They fled in terror, With nothing, you start your
company up, then work outwards, and grow slowly salaried positions, while attractive,
are nothing more then "wage slave", but once you start, it's hard to go back, as
you get a taste for the cash, so perhaps the wisest minds, threw the lot away, started
early, and well just built up, pick and angle and go with it, only what if it fails?
then what, give up, and succumb to society. try and appeal/compromise and or what
is that encouraging the fear? or getting past it, i think society humours the fear,
and grows it up, rather then concurring it, which is a shame, I preferred love (once),
passion and well sex to that... screw it the price of not being myself is too high, i shall fall into nothing, and deminish, free to rule in hell, then serve, as a slave in heaven. because freedom, and lossing the fear was worth it...
Shame, never did get much else, and perhaps never will
again of either sort, an ode to lilith (just to keep the theme going)
So *broke* donations welcome..
the irony, is once you get a taste for growth, do you ever stop? and when do you
stop, and consider the rest? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
which is perhaps why the richest men, are often the most generous, as money is leverage
to a point, then what. still the banks, and who's getting the cash? credit cards,
and pumping the poor? and using honesty against them, never struck me, as being
ethical, your supposed to help people, not screw them over, as when the biggest
of us, use peoples, opinions, and oppinions against them, we destroy it, the biggest must
therefore set the example. good people, look past the flaws, focus on what can be
done, and where. most banks never do that, it's how do we screw them over.. one
by one... or is that only the managers I've dealt with? correct the banks, and lead
by example... it's obvious, who the good guys are, and the bad....
So one wonders is giving to the red cross, while getting nothing sensible... perhaps not,
but at least if i go down, they would in part have gained in part,
maybe someone's life on the other side of the globe, i've never even met, benefit from the crap of western democracy, which so isn't there yet.
and yet the rise of those who would suppress the liberty and morality of others, continues unabaited, and it looks like the bottomless pit, in the name of god continues.
so perhaps, a campaign
which sees people get so many loans, out then give it all to charity, they go down
in flames, while the charity has laundered the cash, and the poorest of the poor
get it, of course efficient being what it is, that would perhaps fails, but one
wonders on the morality of some, and the weakness of others what is strength,
where is leadership quality, and why are some people, just pricks? Now matter,
what is said and done... ahh well to many ideas, mingled, and joined, that no one can handle it, oh to the American indian, long gone...
sensible at last... civilisation destroyed by incompetence as is the way, the western way, the Islamic way, for neither learnt to let them be...
and by the looks of it, never shall...
i pity both, and mourn neither, and god, is long past its sell by date, on
both counts. for the fools, never learnt a dam, and never shall...
and the irony of walking to the window, anoyed, angry and weeing two birds,
one joining the other, and the love you in my head, and thinking that's sweet, tears
to my eyes, and still the world has been and gone, they destroyed it, which
is a pity as the devil was the world, and god the looser... for she never forgave
in time... |
|